SD-19 Parts Management GuideIn todays acquisition environment-characterized by rapidly changing designs, increased risk for Department of Defense DoD weapon systems and equipment acquisition contracts due to an increase in the use of commercial part types, offshore manufacture of parts, and Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages DMSMS-the need for contractors to have an effective Parts Management Program PMP is greater than ever before.The PMP is an integral part of the acquisition process for design, development, modification, and support of weapon systems and equipment.

Pages 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48

Item or activity

SRR

SFR

PDR

CDR

PRR

MS B, MS C, and FRP

Post IOC

Do the parts and material selection processes and criteria ensure items satisfy the worst-case DRMP and design envi- ronment?

Do the parts and material selection processes and criteria ensure items satisfy the worst-case DRMP and design envi- ronment?

Do the parts and material selection processes and criteria ensure items satisfy the worst-case DRMP and design envi- ronment?

Do the parts and material selection processes and criteria ensure items satisfy the worst-case DRMP and design envi- ronment?

Do the parts and material selection processes and criteria ensure items satisfy the worst-case DRMP and design envi- ronment?

Do the parts and material selection processes and criteria for mod- ifications ensure items satisfy the worst-case DRMP and design environ- ment?

Do the parts selection crite- ria account for life-cycle affordability (e.g., stan- dardization, reliability, availability, maintainability, and supporta- bility of parts)?

Do the parts selection crite- ria account for life-cycle affordability (e.g., stan- dardization, reliability, availability, maintainability, and supporta- bility of parts)?

Do the parts selection crite- ria account for life-cycle affordability (e.g., stan- dardization, reliability, availability, maintainability, and supporta- bility of parts)?

Do the parts selection crite- ria account for life-cycle affordability (e.g., stan- dardization, reliability, availability, maintainability, and supporta- bility of parts)?

Do the parts selection crite- ria account for life-cycle affordability (e.g., stan- dardization, reliability, availability, maintainability, and supporta- bility of parts)?

Do the parts selection criteria for modifica- tions account

for life-cycle affordability (e.g., standardi-

zation, reliability, availability, maintainability, and supportabil- ity of parts)?

Obsolescence management

Has obsoles- cence risk

been assessed for new electronic

parts as they are selected?

Has obsoles- cence risk

been assessed for new electronic

parts as they are selected?

Has obsoles- cence risk

been assessed for new electronic

parts as they are selected?

Has obsoles- cence risk

been assessed for new electronic

parts as they are selected?

Has obsoles- cence risk

been assessed for new electronic

parts as they are selected?

Has obsoles- cence risk

been assessed for new electronic parts as they are selected?

Parts list or

BOM

Does the con- tract require the BOM to be delivered to the acquisition activity?

Has the deliv- erable BOM format been defined and documented?

Has the deliv- erable BOM format been agreed upon?

Has the BOM been submit- ted?

Has the BOM been accept- ed?

Has the BOM been submit- ted and accepted?

Has the BOM for any modifi- cations been submitted and accepted?