MIL-HDBK-965
Option C - Government guidance with as -built parts list
Limited Government logistics/depot support required No line repair/maintenance below depot level Examples:
Major procurements
Subsystems of major procurements
Option D - Government advisor in parts selection
Government logistics/depot support required
Full line/depot repair/maintenance
Examples:
Major procurements
Subsystems of major procurements
High reliability program such as space operations
Appendix A contains suggested, tailorable task statements that may be used in a SOW. Detailed guidance for implementation of these options is addressed in 5.1.
4.2 Application to OTS and NDI. Parts contained in commercial and NDI equipment used in the end item are not subject to the parts management procedures described in options B, C, and D unless required by the AA in the RFP and/or the SOW. In response to the RFP, the prospective contractor should identify the commercial and NDI systems, subsystems, or assemblies for use under the contract to the extent possible. When commercial and NDI equipment requires modification, only the new parts proposed for modification of the equipment should be subject to the appropriate parts selection procedures described herein.
4.3 Order of preference in parts selection. Unless otherwise specified in the contract, the contractor should select parts in the descending order of preference as follows:
a. Parts required to meet Government regulatory organizations' regulations.
b. Parts defined by standards produced by recognized national consensus standards societies and organizations.
c. Military or Government standard parts. d. OEM corporate standard type parts.
e. Source control drawings or vendor item drawings.
f. Parts identified by part manufacturer part numbers which are controlled by their drawings, catalogs, or company standards.
4.4 Replacement parts. The process for the management and documentation of parts, other than those on an as-built or as-designed parts list, should be specified in the SOW or by a program document specified in the SOW. In specifying the part replacement process, care should be taken to ensure that the program is consistent with the intent and application of other systems engineering disciplines (e.g., reliability, configuration management, quality, logistics, etc.). These disciplines are interdependent with the parts management program and the activities of each should be coordinated. The part replacement process should address the scope of management for each phase of hardware manufacture (i.e., prototype, preproduction, and production).
6
For Parts Inquires call Parts Hangar, Inc (727) 493-0744
© Copyright 2015 Integrated Publishing, Inc.
A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business